politico:
i guess i should add my confusion to the list of confusions--when you said this:
Quote:
|
What I'm really trying to say is that the liberal majority in Tilted Politics is interested in discussing only a narrow range of issues that are predicated on false assumptions about the nature of politics.
|
you appear to be saying that you see some kind of misunderstanding amongst the "liberal majority" here concerning how the political is defined/understood as a category.
or you could have been saying "they argue on premises that i disagree with"--which is not the same.
which did you mean?
if the first, i really dont see what you are referring to, but it'd be maybe an interesting conversation to have.
if you meant the second, i dont see what there is to say about it--because all it would entail is "there are different viewpoints that depart from different assumptions about x or y"...
as for your "radical critique"--bring it. it'd be interesting to see, and i think the collective could deal with it.