Quote:
|
Originally Posted by roachboy
this should be obvious. there are at least two levels of trouble for the bushpeople at this point
|
By "bushpeople" I assume you mean "us" since we are paying for the war in more ways than one and American's are putting their lives at risk.
If you think Bush is wrong and the costs are too high shouldn't "we" do something? Shouldn't Congress do something other than pass non-binding resolutions?
Quote:
|
--(a) there is considerable resentment about the way in which the administration chumped congress
|
Was Hilery Clinton "chumped"? Even if the others were, didn't she have access to information through her husband that noone else would have about the threat. And she called it a threat, as did her husband.
Quote:
|
the primary obstacle to pursuit of this direction seems to be the amount of shit the neocons would have to eat to do it--
|
Neocons are in a position where we can easily distance ourselves from Bush's policy. Bush only has two years left in his term in office, and he wants to win. He has blinders on, nothing will cause him to voluntarily give in. (I can not emphasize that enough, but nobody seems to get it) That is the obstacle in the pursuit of a change in direction. Given Congress has no balls, the direction will not change. We can only hope for a hail Mary pass, where by some means Bush's strategy works.