Quote:
Here is what I got out of the above.
I am smarter than you. When I challenge your source that is o.k., but if you challenge my source you are wrong. And one other thing, while I am at it here is another personal attack on Ace, eventhough my attack adds no value to my point.
Here is a very simplistic thought. Give credit when good points are made. Also, conceding to the obvious allows the discussion to progress. I often give "simplistic analogies", because of what appears to be fundemental disagreements on obvious points.
I have often acknowledged that some "conservative sources" I have given has been political (i.e. - discussions where I provided info on global warming and and Walmart), however, I have yet to see the same kind of acknowledgement about a "liberal" source.however, I have yet to see the same kind of acknowledgement about a "liberal" source. I can see conservatives being guilty of what you suggest, but guess what. Perhaps liberals are guilty of it too.
|
Ace..i am sorry you see it that way.
I encourage you or anyone to challange any factual declaration I make or any source of mine with
FACTS of your own and if yours have more merit than mine, I am man enough to admit it or to discuss it further. When you resort to comparing Saddam to a grizzly bear (or was it polar bear) caged in a zoo or comparing a corporate ceo to a babysitter, I think it is simplistic and irrelevant to any reasonable discussion. It is not a personal attack on you. It is a critique of your methods of discourse.
I have also crtiticized as many of Host's sources as I have your conservative "opinion" pieces (from IBD and other sources) as not being factual.