Fermi

I wish that were the case Carno....I have plenty of time (3 more weeks) and I have done a ton of research. But the more research I do, the more it confuses me. I will read Pico's perspective and writings and find myself agreeing with what he says (all knowledge shares basic common truths, the concept of individual worth, masters of our own destiny, etc), but in my heart I don't feel that mankind is inherently good. Then I read Machiavelli's perspective and writings, and although I disagree with some of it, such as man using any means (deceit, duplicity, ruthlessness,etc) to get what he wants, I agree with his assessment of man as greedy, corrupt, and that allowing "morality" to govern his desires only stands in the way of effective governing. Isn't that what some accuse George Bush of doing? Using his "morals" to impose law and order on citizens? So, you see, I am torn. I have to pick only one side. And while I have never had a problem with research papers, essays, or persuasive arguements, this time I am really conflicted. I thought that by going to a site where people profess to having some insight into philosophy that I could brainstorm and get differing views that might shed some light on my own turmoil with this assignment. I thought that perhaps I would have an 'aha' moment and then it would all come together. I am not looking for someone to "write" my paper...I am perfectly capable of doing that myself and have done so more times than I care to count in my 5 years of college. I just wanted to find out what others thought of these men (if they have ever even read any of their works). I am not philosophical by nature, that is why my major is the hard sciences. I apologize if I came across as looking for a handout.

Chi,
Thank you for replying! I feel the exact same so now you see my dilema....I also think "both"...sigh!