Quote:
Originally Posted by shakran
Apology accepted.
Now, if Chrysler wants to survive it needs to 1) stop replicating cars across brands. The Town and Country is the exact same car as the Caravan, for instance. That's silly.
The second thing it needs to do is separate from Daimler. GM and Ford are making shitty cars right now. If Chrysler weren't a foreign car company they'd have a real leg up since the "I'll only buy american" crowd would flock to them.
And they need to take a long hard look at Honda and Toyota and start doing business like the japanese companies do. Make cars that will run forever, and that don't have to be repaired all the time. It would help if they'd own up to safety defects and fix them. Chrysler took a big image blow when it refused to replace faulty disc brakes on the PT Cruiser that rusted up and could fail when exposed to winter driving conditions. They only issued a recall in the states that made them - neighboring states with just as much road salt got shafted.
The whole problem with the american auto industry is that 1) they choose short term profits over long term income every time and 2) they see a trend, and then put all their eggs in that trend's basket. Big cars were cool in the 60's and early 70's, so rather than make a few small cars as well the Americans went crazy with the land barges. Then the oil crisis hit and the Americans were left out in the cold. But they didn't learn their lesson because in the 90's they all concentrated on making the biggest gas guzzlin' SUV they could, and they're paying for it now. Meanwhile the diversified Japanese cars are still selling fine because you can get tiny (Honda fit) all the way up to huge (toyota tacoma), and get better gas mileage while you're doing it.
And the American auto makers need to stop relying on the "support America!" crap, because today's savvy consumer is perfectly willing to support America by buying American as long as America isn't making junk. . .which they are.
|
Really? Careful where you tread here...
Or in other words, back it up with concrete examples. You don't want people generalizing about your livelyhood. Don't do it to others. Some things in your post are true. Namely, American companies failure to predict changes in the market before they happen. But others are not factual. You can get a Chevrolet Aveo that gets just as good gas mileage as a Honda Fit and you can get a Silverado that gets better mileage than a Tacoma.
Also, in the '90's most automakers went head long into full size, body-on-frame SUV's because of the huge profit margins they generated. Between Toyota and Lexus there are 4 different ones for sale. In addition, Chrysler wasn't the only company platform sharing with the Caravan and Town and Country. A VW Beetle and Rabbit as well as the Audi A3 and TT are all the same car underneath.
And before the question is asked: I drive a Subaru Outback.