Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
There was no contradiction.
|
You made the assertion that science will never be able to prove the existence of God after poiting out the fallacy in "making a concrete assertion based on inconclusive/incomplete evidence."
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
Pointing out the fact that there is no physical evidence of God's existence isn't absurd. Stating that God doesn't exist because of a lack of physical evidence, however, is absurd.
|
All hail Nilla Waifer.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
Science doesn't claim that an object doesn't exist if there is no evidence of it but rather that the object might exist in the absence of scientific evidence. That's, like, the third time I've repeated that.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
Lack of evidence doesn't equal non-existence.
|
Atheists are not saying "God does not exist", but rather "God probably does not exist." There's, like, a difference.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
I already answered this:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
First and foremost, there theists possess no burden of proof. You seem to forget that theistic beliefs aren't based on any set of logical reasoning. Our beliefs are based on faith, and faith is very, very different from logic. If anyone must disprove the notion of God, it's you.
|
That's why.
Did you, like, not read anything I typed out? I don't have to explain my faith based on logical reasoning as faith is, by nature, illogical and isn't based on reason. |
Explain how faith is seperate from logic and reason.