View Single Post
Old 02-13-2007, 08:32 AM   #42 (permalink)
ngdawg
peekaboo
 
ngdawg's Avatar
 
Location: on the back, bitch
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill O'Rights
Perhaps you are right. But, I do not live in a 3rd world country, and I enjoy the luxury of allowing my children to be children for as long as they are children.
Agree wholeheartedly. Once we're adults, that's it for childhood, there's no going back, no matter how immature some of us are. We can allow them to keep their childhood ways without treating them like babies or the direct opposite-treating them like adults.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill O'Rights
I'm not sure how to address this. I mean, I'm 44 years old, but I'm always going to be my mother's "baby". Molly-coddling. Hmmm...let's see...well, let's look at it this way. Mistakes have to be made. It's how we learn. While we have to allow our chilren to fall down and scrape their knees, it is a parents instinct to protect thier child. There is a vast spectrum between never allowing the training wheels to come off, and allowing a child to ride his bike off of the roof. The best that we can do is to be there to help pick the child up when they take a particularly nasty tumble.
And protecting them from that nasty tumble if it's 100% certain that would be the result.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill O'Rights
Again...I do have the luxury of not living in a jungle, and will make the best of it. What is deviant, or wrong, is predicated by the needs and values of society as a whole. While it may be perfectly acceptable to follow certain practices in my allegorical jungle, following those same practices in Pleasantville, USA will justifiably land you in prison.
I don't see how anyone could compare the practices to a third world country to one that is not. Someone had brought up the point of people 100-200 years ago living in 1-room log cabins and having sex. There were also gunfights and disease...life expectancy was low; women had babies at 16, 17 years of age and kept having them until they no longer could or died.
Society has changed, mostly for the better.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill O'Rights
Don't read so much into it. There is nothing wrong with letting children "know" about sex. They are, in my own opinion, ready to know as soon as they start to ask questions about it. That is not the same as allowing them to participate. And I do believe that allowing a 9 year old to "watch" is tantamount to participation.
Agreed again. This, to me, was tanatamount to forcing that participation. Anyone with half a brain would have either left the room to get it on or told the child to do so. This kid is probably going to start having sex by age 13, because 'it's no big deal, mommy liked it'. Or go the other extreme and be traumatized into thinking it's 'disgusting'. Either way, I don't see one thing 'healthy' about this situation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill O'Rights
I see what you're saying...I really do And, to some degree, I agree wholeheartedly. I see far too many young adults, and...oh, what the hell...even older adults, that were never allowed to mature.

On the other hand. We have the luxury (and that's not a bad thing) to let children be children when they should be children.

Look at it this way. I grew up in Pennsylvania coal country. A hundred years ago it would've been very common for a 9 year old to go work in the mines. Somewhere along the line, we saw that that wasn't right. We let them be children. As a result, I didn't have to go work in the mines. I got to play. I got to grow and mature and develop at a healthy pace. Am I making any sense?

Look, I'm not going to take the tired old "You don't have children, so you could never possibly understand." route. That's a cop out, at best. What I will say is that you (a collective you) have to understand that children are not miniature adults. They need to grow. And they need to grow at an appropriate pace.
My spouse's grandmother was married at 16, had her first child at 17, became a grandmother at 37. This was over 80 years ago. Now, when that happens, we immediately think, that poor deprived kid. My kids are almost 15, and they are still 'kids', albeit smart ones that I can converse with on a more adult level.
But, like I said earlier, and I say it to them, they need to keep that kiddom, enjoy their lives as kids. Once they're adults, they can't go back. Forcing them to 'accept' or 'view' what is, foremost, an intimate part of that adulthood is, to me, a form of abuse.
Had I known this woman, a hard smack to the back of her head with a 'wtf is WRONG with you??' would probably have been required.
__________________
Don't blame me. I didn't vote for either of'em.
ngdawg is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360