Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
No I'm not referring to that. Gilda's question is why is it relevant, it may not be relevant. Lawyers do in fact, use people's lifestyles and livelihood to paint pictures toe play on the "stereotypes" that people have in their heads to help create or dissuade reasonable doubt.
|
Again, there's nothing to "reasonably doubt." The issue isn't whether the facts into evidence are true or not. They are not in dispute so there can't be any doubt, reasonable or otherwise. The only issue is whether the actions deserve a jail sentence and the jury decided no...
Just out of curiosity, to what were you "not" referring? The chewbacca defense? The "she had it cumming" joke?