View Single Post
Old 02-09-2007, 03:58 PM   #28 (permalink)
Ch'i
Artist of Life
 
Ch'i's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlatan
As for your contention that Atheism is a religion. There is just no arguing with that. You are 100% wrong in your position. Based on *any* definition of religion I know, being an Atheist has nothing to do with religion and it has little to do with faith.
I may be mistaken, but SF's assertion of Atheism being a religion seemed to be directed more towards its following and less towards its actual definition. Atheism, indeed, does not act as most religious bodies do, or even resembles a religion for that matter. There is, however, a risk of it becoming "religious." Spokespersons for Atheism must tread lightly upon the method in which they spread their message. It would be very easy for any one of those representatives to start preaching Atheism, or eventually even forcing it upon others.

Atheist are most certainly a persecuted minority in most countries. It is this intollerance most religions pass down through their teachings, intentionally or unintentionally, that I cannot stand. It certainly justifies the disputable connotation of anger tied to Atheism. Hopefully fortitude against such things become tied to Atheism as well, because the last thing this world needs is another intollerant religion.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Famous
since Dawkins makes so much of his claim to be a scientist, people that support him should have a little respect of the scientific method... science can only prove that things are true, not really that things cannot be true - unless every circumstance can be controlled.
Huh? Redundance aside, I'm not sure what you mean by this. Are you talking about scientific process of elimination?

Quote:
If you observe a pond and see 100 white swans, then you can say you have proved that a swan can be white, but it isnt so easy to say that it is impossible for there ever to be a black swan.
We don't know if there even is a swan; we don't even know if there is a pond; we don't know if we are capable of ever even observing the swan or its environment. We can hardly speculate on assumptions. Scientific method is only applicable when a theory has some basis of plausible relevance in reality. In the case of Atheism and religion, neither can logically refute the other. Though, as far as we know, Atheism is more correct than religion, from a logical point of view.

Last edited by Ch'i; 02-09-2007 at 05:16 PM.. Reason: Responding to Strange Famous
Ch'i is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360