Dawkins has some interesting things to say, but I find Carl Sagan has (had
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3467d/3467d0294b3ebe2a86d094f6f0f65977387b759d" alt="Frown"
) a much more reasonable attitude toward the whole science/religion thing.
A book was recently published comprised of a series of lectures he gave on the subject (in 1985, so there are a fair amount of references to nuclear warheads). It's very good, and better than Dawkins' thoughts on the issue in just about every way.