Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
I happened to watch that on TV and I saw nothing wrong with it.
|
Nothing wrong with it? I'd agree that it wasn't "over the line", whatever that means, but it certainly struck me as intellectually lazy. What's the point of a panel discussion with no disagreement? There's no challenge in preaching to the choir. If they were going to go that route, they should've just stuck with a single speaker and removed the false semblance of a debate.
To the OP:
I got the impression, though, that the reporter didn't expect a lack of dissent, what with her "no one's going to defend them?" question. Am I just being gullible there?