View Single Post
Old 02-02-2007, 09:58 PM   #10 (permalink)
ngdawg
peekaboo
 
ngdawg's Avatar
 
Location: on the back, bitch
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tigerlily
Excuse me for butting in when I'm such a newb here, but I've been around forums in general a long long time.

It's when you start taking things TOO seriously that the place goes to shit. Aren't general forums supposed to be a fun place to interact with other people.

It's the internet, it's not rocket science, and it's not life and death. If the owner of the site wants to run the site a certain way, then it seems to me he/she is entirely entitled to do it, and if there's a few casualties along the way... then that's just how it goes.
One of the downsides of a 'successful' forum (and I've been seeing this elsewhere, not just here), is, in the length of time the forums around, added to the amount(in sheer numbers) of users, personalities, coupled with perceived predictability start to come into play. TFP is in middle age in internet years, far outlasting many other forums. One person always responds to that person out of old-time habits and the perceived predictability, leading to a why bother, leading to less posting until something new comes up....and the older it gets, the less something new comes up....a common phrase used here lately is 'I haven't been posting here for a while....'
People get a comfort zone as well and 'personalities' and quirks show through-now you have likes and dislikes based on what you see on your screen.
Put in real-life relationships (TFP has many married, dating, related members as well as friendships in real life and yes, animosity) and it affects how one 'behaves', albeit text-based.
The mod/owner thing mentioned is brought up on occasion. While this is a forum and not a 'business', anything with people trying to run/control/moderate needs a chain of command. If it doesn't why are there admins/super mods/ mods? I will say, TFP runs quite well with very little mod interference-they've been used more as Dear Abby at some points or go-betweens for one-on-one conflicts-not sure that's a good idea, using anyone as a mediator. A mediator down the line, though, might not be a bad idea.
(hmm...there's an untapped business:forum-participant conflict mediator)
Everyone's going to offer up ideas, suggestions on how to make it 'better' but it won't get better if no one wants to work at what's wrong first.
Then when it gets better, it will be a place that people want to go to, not run like hell from. All the advertising in the world isn't gonna do squat if you don't live up to it.
__________________
Don't blame me. I didn't vote for either of'em.
ngdawg is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360