Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jorgelito
For a long time, Ringo has been referred to as the "expendable" Beatle, or considered the one who made little or no contribution to the canon of Beatles' music.
|
By people with too much time on their hands.
I've heard this mentioned before, and it annoys me. How does it even come up? The Beatles were a
group. None were expendable. Remove any one of the four...and you no longer have the sum of the parts.
OK. Ringo was no Lennon, McCartney or Harrison. But he brought his
own talent to The Beatles. All four of the "lads"
together, made The Beatles what they were. Not one. Not two, or even three.