No donor funds were harmed in the making of this forum.
I don't get the concept of thinking "enough" about the process. I mean, it's an idea. That's all it is. That's as much thinking that needs to go on. The reason why I made it was because I didn't know what would happen and I wanted to see. I'm seeing SOMETHING. It's interesting.
I made a thread in Philosophy a while back about a similar idea and I got a whole range of suggestions. The actual execution has changed and it's an interesting system.
What is bad about the forum's presence?
1) You don't have to even view it if you don't want to. (let's get that one out of the way.)
2) It is not affiliated with the TFP by any declaration. It's MY site.
3) The comments on it about the TFP are no different than if the users had come from some other SINGLE site. More diversity is in the works.
4) I think I know at least one forum on the internet that was created entirely out of spite for the TFP... this isn't it.
5) The site is not even 3 days old. If an engine sounded as bad running as it does turning over, then we have a problem... but it's not even running yet!
In other words, the experiment has yet to begun. However, the gallery of comments is starting to sound like a bunch of unimpressed art critics and over-protective soccer moms. Yeah, you have every right to denounce the work, but don't judge the canvas before it's got any ink on it.
Last edited by Halx; 01-31-2007 at 04:00 PM..
|