Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
Impeaching one would automaticaly impeach the other as they have coluded on all points including being united in fooling the senate into thinking Iraq was a threat. Nancy would take over, no?
|
no. you couldn't impeach both at once, even if there was collusion. The only way Nancy could take over is if both of them were killed too close together to select replacements.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
Not really. If you offer people a cheaper mode of transportation, I suspect that the oil industries will be screwed. The idea is to do what is in the best interest of the US and the planet.
|
you're making two very large and incredibly unlikely assumptions here. 1) that people will readily accept a cheaper mode of transportation instead of their own private automobiles (and by making gas even more expensive is only going to get an electorate in the next election that promises to bring back cheap gas) and 2) that the majority of this country are interested in making a lifestyle change to protect the environment.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
So the US troops, lack of clean water, lack of electricity, lack of food and instable economy aren't sources for instability?
|
I wasn't saying that they weren't, but you're talking about one of the oldest religious conflicts in the area. Do you truly think they'll stop the violence if the US troops leave the area? Or if the get clean water? or have more jobs?