|
pan....can you post something....anything....that we can "sink our teeth into".
Something that can be examined, held up to the light. I posted an article of eleven pages, written last november, that some are saying is the current definitive article on Hillary Clinton. It offers verifiable information....an example is her political opponent, Sen. Sam Brownback's reaching out to her, in a prayer breakfast of all places, her response of immediate, genuine, forgiveness, and the"proof"...the two went on from there to work together on legislative issues.
I don't have a horse in that race, pan. I don't even like Hillary. I liked your bold, red lettered rant, even less. Especially after your red lettered comments, it was incumbent upon you, to offer more than an "I feel this way......".
You've backed up nothing, pan. If moving towards the middle is simply replacing facts with feelings, it's a big disappointment to watch. I'm uncomfortable ever stating anything that I can't share the reasoning....the research behind. If that is "extreme", then call me an extremist.
If "I still feel" that such and such is such....and that is all that you've got, IMO it borders on an incoherent post. You say you have "grown" since the last time that you took the "left or right" test. To me, "growing" is an increasing ability to defend your arguments, even if it is to your own satisfaction.....but it should include an effort to include an increasing body of reliable sources to draw from to support your new found thinking.
Why aren't you sharing it with us?
|