I think if you read what I said, I agree that there was no charge of leaking classified information.
I was getting at motive. I do believe that the alleged perjury and obstruction were motivated by an attempt to cover-up how this admistration abuses classfied information for political purposes.
I am a policy wonk, not a lawyer,but I think the "he said/he said" defense is a risky strategy, particularly if your "he" is a White House senior aide and you are facing a jury not predisposed to be simpathetic to him or his boss.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire
Last edited by dc_dux; 01-23-2007 at 09:10 PM..
|