pan:
so let me get this straight.
the "argument" in your post seems to be:
1. if i were to agree with you politically, i would be on the path to well-being, but if i persist in not agreeing with you politically, i am on a path to negativity and bitterness.
2. everyone who disagrees with you politically is the same, united in their disagreement with you. everyone who disagrees with you is an extremist.
so that
3.you are the center of the political universe. your positions are the absolute. everything about american politics is arrayed around you as its center.
i didnt know you were that important pan.
see what distortions a messageboard format can introduce?
mea culpa.
i think you could help me spare myself alot of work: why should anyone bother to think for themselves when they can just check in with you?
and if you do think for yourself and find yourself drifting unacceptably, you will inform them of this drift by throwing them out of the Big Musical.
dont get me wrong on this: i appreciate that you take time out from your important centering functions to throw me out of the Big Musical.
i take it as an example of your largesse, and i am suitably grateful.
but in order to reduce the time i may be spending flailing about in the Land of the Unacceptable and Bitter, why dont you let me know which positions of yours should i adopt in order to bring myself to happiness and well-being?
it'd help me become a better person, i am sure.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
|