Quote:
|
Originally Posted by host
Dc-dux, I would like to read your reaction to this Steve Clemons piece on Bill Richardson, and your opinion of both of them, as far as the integrity of each.
http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/001884.php
I was surprised to read what Clemons had to say. I agree that Richardson has no chance other than to run a symbolic campaign and get in the way of more promising prospects. I share Clemons opinion of Richardson, but his accusations are news to me. |
Host...I've heard the accusations about Richardson. Others describe him as just an outgoing "schmoozer" (picture something between Bush's back-slapping good ole boy style and Clinton's lusty womanizing approach) whose style may make some uncomfortable. He probably should tone it down if he wants to play in the national arena. He also can play hardball politics with the best of them as was evident by his position on Bolton, something he was passionate about from his own experience as UN ambassador. His lack of diligence as Energy Secy is a more serious shortcoming that he will have to deal with in the campaign.
I dont think he will get in the way of other candidates. He brings a unique perspective to the campaign as a red (or purple) state Dem with moderate positions on immigration, gun control, welfare, energy/environment. I imagine he will more likely be in a position to consolidate his supporters around the major candidate of his choosing at some point that will broaden that candidate's support.