Quote:
|
Originally Posted by reconmike
Endless bombings? All he did was attempt to enforce the no-fly zones.
|
What's this "all he did" business? You think two rounds of cruise missle strikes is small somehow? I guess I could understand that, considering Clinton never invaded Iraq or was directly responsible for increasing global terrorism.
Clinton's record:
93: Clinton, shortly after the first WTC bombing, bombed Iraq because Saddam attempted to kill President George H. W. Bush.
9/96: Clinton, with bipartisan support, launches two rounds of cruise missle strikes into Baghdad.
12/98 Clinton orders multilateral attacks on military and security targets in Iraq in order to hinder any nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons programs that could threaten Iraq's neighbors.
Unfortunately, Clinton was not strong enough to avoid following in the foolish footsteps of Bush 1, when he made his "New World Order" announcement as bombs dropped on Baghdad in 1991. Clinton fell into the opinion that we are a violent and dangerous state and we have no qualms attacking anyone for any reason.
BUT, what Clinton did pales in comparison to the invasion and occupation of Iraq.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by reconmike
Now your OBL comment is really funny, is this the same president who was offered OBL by Sudan and told them that he didnt have any evidence he was involved in anything?
|
Only that's not true. The Sudanese never offered Clinton OBL, even though they later claimed it. Hassan Absurabi was friends and buisness partners with OBL, and would not have made such an offer.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by reconmike
That IS Echelon, and some more endless cut and pastes because I am in a Host is my pasting hero mood.  |
OH, the Echelon spy system/network. Sorry. I misunderstood what you meant. I'm still not 100% clear on the context.