Quote:
|
Originally Posted by yournamehere
I <i>still</i> haven't forgiven Dan Ackroyd for <i>Caddyshack II</i>
|
I'd add blues brothers 2000 to that.
The thing about a sequel is that in order to be justified the first movie had to be pretty decent (please don't post exceptions to that statement it is a generalization), so a sequel has to measure up and often, although it may be a good film, it will not be up to the standard of the original. Also a lot of sequels are cynical money making devices using the popularity of the original to make a few dollars