Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ngdawg
What if some clicked on a porn site not realizing there were kids used?
|
This is where the SBI comes into play. The SBI can track the use of the site as well as how often you viewed, how long you stayed on each site and if you saved any pictures or shared them.
When I was reading NJ's sex crime laws alot of the endangerment to children laws were about child porn. Be it possessing or making.
To me, if you are convicted of forcible sexual assault then it's tier 3. You used a weapon or your power to get a piece of ass. That's what prisoners do.. do it there.
I saw a guy who had sexually assaulted a 3 year old child of a girlfriend. These are the people who need to be seriously evaluated. We know that while the AOC is 16, and since I argue that perhaps it should be much lower, that a 3 year old has no way of knowing what's going on. That's pedophilia and while it may not have been predatory, it's still an infant and that needs to be treated as pedophilia. When we have people who 'sexually assaulted' an under 18 victim and place them on this same registry as actual pedophiles it creates the problem we have now. People hear sex offender and automatically assume pedophile. There has to be distinctions.
I was watching Nancy Grace for about 5 minutes last night (sorry I hate her and think she does more harm than good with her show) and some boy was abducted. Before she even said anything about the parents could have done it or random people, she started flashing names of sex offenders in the county and saying that it was probably a sex offender. Come on, seriously. Don't start a witch hunt until we have some facts. The police will automatically check the status of the registered offenders when an abduction occurs. We don't need everyone to start harassing someone who was at a 3rd shift job just because he's on a silly list.
God I hate her.