Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ShaniFaye
The GA registry give the information as well
if you go here for NJ
https://www6.state.nj.us/LPS_spoff/geographicsearch.jsp
it seems to give more information on an individual than the site that was originally posted, it also lists the tier level and more of a description of the vicitm (age range and sex) and what the person did |
That's the site I got the tier level from...only lists victims as, for first offense,
'under 18, 'female' and the second, 'adult', female' and dates of 'dispostion', along with the usual address, aliases, etc. He's listed twice-I reckon because he has two offenses? Wow...there's 5 mug shots...is that required every time he registers? There's no information posted about parole/probation stats that I can see(sorry, but I simply will not actually post the page) so, if there's more, I don't see how to access it.
Interestingly, the Klasskids site directs one to the state police site which then directs to this one...I have a sneaking suspicion that, had I paid that $35 for 'detailed information', I'd have gotten just this.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Guccilvr
After perusing some of the profiles listed on that site. To me it looks like NJ hands down too many Tier-2 judgements. There were tier 2's that had used guns and physical force to assault. In NC or FL they would be tier-3 easily.
This shows how flawed the system really is. Now I haven't gone and read all the by-laws of NJ (I browsed the site the other day defining the laws) and some are quite different that here, but alot of them follow the same vein. I think the first step in getting this corrected would be to find out the age that is capable of sexual relations and then making a universal law set for sex crimes. Then we can get a better grasp of what pedophilia is and what the other dangerous fetishes are. Once we can more easily determine these, it would be easier to set people up in a tierd system and sentence easier as well.
|
I agree. NJ is a bit inconsistent, but I'd assume most states are. It goes back to what I'd said earlier: If he's a tier2 and there's only 3 categories, where is the line drawn? His offenses are 'wreckless endangerment of a child'(assault of a juvenile acquaintance) and 'aggravated sexual contact(exposure to two stranger women; I have no idea what that could mean) and he's listed as a 'moderate threat'. Now, while I'd go with a 'moderate threat, tier2' to gauge my own level of safety with my family, why is he?
NJ is having a field day right now with busting people with child pornography on their computers to the point of recently having a massive 'round-up' across the state. Whether some plead out or get convicted, are they all now tier2 registrants? What if some clicked on a porn site not realizing there were kids used? Now that history teacher or coach is a sexual predator just one 'tier' away from being a threat to society.