Quote:
Really? Then what, specifically, did he do, and who did he do it to? Did she consent to it? Did he know her? Was the conviction the result of a plea bargain?
|
Tell me where there's a victim's registry and I'll get right on it. Until then, the information released by the NJSP was as thorough as the law allows. What the crimes were/are are clear enough to pose the remotest threat to the public. My assumptions that they were not of your continually pointed out 'sex with a consenting girl under 18' is certainly closer to what the details point to and, less than 24 hours later, his status confirms, best as can be allowed under law. You yourself are making assumptions that I 'assumed' with nothing in front of me. That's a stupid way to handle things, IMO. No final conclusions have been or were drawn, but acting upon what I had and have was important to rectify mistakes made by the subject and by the authorities as quickly and as safely as could be done without undue harm to anyone-which is what happened.
Quote:
Here you say that while you don't have the information, you know where you can get it but are unwilling to pay for it.
|
Yes, I could pay $35.95 and get his phone number, his past addresses, his employment records, where he served time, etc. I wasn't willing to do that, Shanifaye told me what to look for, I found it. Got a problem with that, Pookie?
Quote:
.nowhere in the example you posted did I mention a murder-offender list. .
|
I pointed out your consistent use of a trivial scenario as quoted in post 67 in the last line. Please do try to read through, dear, so I don't have to keep repeating...
Quote:
me: I really would assume the very worst since plea bargaining usually involves the lessening of charges.
|
Someone, possibly you (It's late and I don't feel like opening another window again, still...) made the erroneous remark that someone would plea bargain UP...that's what that is in reference to. If someone is going to pea-bargain to an endangering a minor with sexual assault, the assumption could be made their original charges were much worse. If that wasn't clear, sorry. It's a response to a post, not a specific conjecture.
I'm done answering you. You have a distinct need to pick apart, make inconsequential analogies and basically put me on the defensive for protecting my family as if some grievous harm had come to this poor misunderstood man as a result of my perceived vigilanteism. You'd make a good defense lawyer at a rape trial....