View Single Post
Old 01-08-2007, 09:33 PM   #72 (permalink)
ngdawg
peekaboo
 
ngdawg's Avatar
 
Location: on the back, bitch
Quote:
Really? Then what, specifically, did he do, and who did he do it to? Did she consent to it? Did he know her? Was the conviction the result of a plea bargain?
Tell me where there's a victim's registry and I'll get right on it. Until then, the information released by the NJSP was as thorough as the law allows. What the crimes were/are are clear enough to pose the remotest threat to the public. My assumptions that they were not of your continually pointed out 'sex with a consenting girl under 18' is certainly closer to what the details point to and, less than 24 hours later, his status confirms, best as can be allowed under law. You yourself are making assumptions that I 'assumed' with nothing in front of me. That's a stupid way to handle things, IMO. No final conclusions have been or were drawn, but acting upon what I had and have was important to rectify mistakes made by the subject and by the authorities as quickly and as safely as could be done without undue harm to anyone-which is what happened.
Quote:
Here you say that while you don't have the information, you know where you can get it but are unwilling to pay for it.
Yes, I could pay $35.95 and get his phone number, his past addresses, his employment records, where he served time, etc. I wasn't willing to do that, Shanifaye told me what to look for, I found it. Got a problem with that, Pookie?
Quote:
.nowhere in the example you posted did I mention a murder-offender list. .
I pointed out your consistent use of a trivial scenario as quoted in post 67 in the last line. Please do try to read through, dear, so I don't have to keep repeating...
Quote:
me: I really would assume the very worst since plea bargaining usually involves the lessening of charges.
Someone, possibly you (It's late and I don't feel like opening another window again, still...) made the erroneous remark that someone would plea bargain UP...that's what that is in reference to. If someone is going to pea-bargain to an endangering a minor with sexual assault, the assumption could be made their original charges were much worse. If that wasn't clear, sorry. It's a response to a post, not a specific conjecture.

I'm done answering you. You have a distinct need to pick apart, make inconsequential analogies and basically put me on the defensive for protecting my family as if some grievous harm had come to this poor misunderstood man as a result of my perceived vigilanteism. You'd make a good defense lawyer at a rape trial....
__________________
Don't blame me. I didn't vote for either of'em.
ngdawg is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360