No, took me one day. I work, can't post 24/7
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Jazz
The indisputable fact at the center of this discussion is that the guy is a sex offender. He's on the registry, and that's the sole basis of the definition as we're using. That also means her information isn't "shaky". Exactly what sex crimes he committed was only answered in NG's last post (flashing), and until now we haven't had any idea whether or not he's a threat. Even now, we still don't really know.
|
He has two convictions(I posted them early on): first one, in 2000, Wreckless endangerment of a minor-sexual assault. Second, in 2003, Indecent Exposure to stranger women.