Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Jazz
If you'd read what I've written in this post and earlier, I'm advocating exactly that.
If the neighbor harrasses the guy without any involvement by NG, how is she responsble for that? If she introduces a couple to each other and the guy ends up beating the woman, is NG responsible in any real sense? If she lets people know that a politician is moving in down the street and neighbors start protesting outside that front door, how is she responsible? The point is that other people are responsible for their own actions, and NG is responsible for her own. She's no more responsible for harrassment by someone else than I am for your actions.
As long as she's just notifying neighbors of what's she found, she's well within her rights.
As far as talking to neighbors vs. distributing flyers, one is a form of private speech and the other is a form of public speech. One is a conversation, and the other one is harrassment.
I suggest that everyone go back and read the original post before commenting any further. This thread has warped waaaay of the original post, even more so than usual. I'm as responsible for that as anyone else, but there are lots of erronious assumptions made.
|
I think this post effectively closes the matter on this issue. If anyone can find a square inch of ground with which to dispute this rationally I'll eat my hat. That is, if I had a hat.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
|