View Single Post
Old 01-03-2007, 10:44 PM   #26 (permalink)
Willy
Insane
 
Willy's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sprocket
You might not be militant about your beliefs, but a great many that align themselves with you, are. Instead of thinking rationaly, and informing themselves, they act on pure delusion. They think if they just push hard enough with their ineffective abstinance only education, they can stop teens from having sex. Might as well try and make the earth rotate backwards.

The problems that are the result of irresponsible sex, such as widespread STD's and teen pregnancy are huge burdens for our society. Those are problems most non-evangelical people want to alleviate. Whats wrong with taking practical approaches to reducing those problems? Maybe teach kids (who we know are going to have sex, anyways), how to do it responsibly and at least make them aware of the risks. Go ahead and teach abstinance along side everything else, they arent mutually exclusive lesson plans.

Most evangelicals see the act of sex, itself, as the problem. I can see the logic in that, I really can. If no ones having sex till marriage then the other problems solve themselves. Good luck with that though really.. and as this study shows, your fellow countrymen do not see it that way.

Its funny, the voice you think is fading, I think is yelling louder than ever. Maybe its finally starting to get drowned out by a culture of people that, as indicated by this study, do not share your views on sex, never really have and are finally starting to speak up about it. Guess time will tell.



Not at all!



The world must be a very awful place for you.
This is a straw man. I don't think that anyone thinks that abstinence only education will keep teens from having sex, they feel that conceding that everyone is doing it so we should teach them how implies approval which may make some kids feel that there's nothing wrong with it or that they shouldn't think twice about having sex if the school says it's okay.

I'm not going to make a judgment about whether this is true or not, I already posted that I don't personally agree with this idea, but the irrational argument that you are refuting in your post is not the one being made by the people on the other side and while I think the argument could well be wrong, I don't think it's irrational.
Willy is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360