Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ratbastid
Totally not the point. The point is, an impartial and fair trial would remove, beyond the shadow of a doubt, the stench of US manipulation on the outcome. It would have left the verdict and sentence invulnerable to rhetorical attack in the future. As it was done, the result is extremely vulnerable to questions in the future.
|
That depends greatly on the next 25-30 years of US history. If, by some mericle, the US is able to remain a superpower, it's possible that it'll be too late to truely question the then history books becuase those currently in power and their future replacements will have smudged or even removed so much information about it.