|
I really didn't feel like I had anything more to add to this thread until I read through the opinion, specifically page 10, where I find that not only does Virginia law specifically proscribe a process whereby affected individuals can appeal the denial of their license, but I also find that the plaintiffs are actually currently involved in such procedures!
In short, they're still "in process" not being "denied process"
now, the problem appears to be the "due" (fair) and since neither you nor the claimants agree with what's going on, this is assessed by you as unfair.
that's what I'm getting from this thread, but even though I've now read the judge's opinion for why these actions don't violate their due process, I still haven't seen your logical argument for how this specific scenario does so I'm filling in the blanks the best I can.
__________________
"The theory of a free press is that truth will emerge from free discussion, not that it will be presented perfectly and instantly in any one account." -- Walter Lippmann
"You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists." -- Abbie Hoffman
|