Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
I'm not being sarcastic. I think that judge needs to be in prison next to those police officers for allowing them to sidestep the Fourth Amendment. If they needed a warrent, which they did, they should have gotten one from a real judge.
|
still missing the point. state law provides that a regulatory agency does not need a warrant. several states have used this same 'loophole' to use investigatory practices on a private business/residence. California is one of them. Why aren't these challenged/changed? because the people cannot be bothered by one or two individuals who are having their rights violated. It's portrayed as a service to society, fighting crime, or benefitting the whole as a public service or use. Why aren't more people coming forward to challenge these government practices?
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|