Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
If we stopped printing money that wasn't backed, we'd actually slow inflation. What they're dong is putting a bandaid on an arterial hemorage. Can someone please tell me why the Fed answers to no one?
|
Quote:
The Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act of 1978, known as the Humphrey-Hawkins Act, required the Fed to set one-year target ranges for money supply growth twice a year and to report the targets to Congress. During the heyday of the monetary aggregates, in the early 1980s, analysts paid a great deal of attention to the Fed's weekly money supply reports, and especially to the reports on M1. If, for example, the Fed released a higher-than-expected M1 figure, the markets surmised that the Fed would soon try to curb money supply growth to bring it back to its target, possibly increasing short-term interest rates in the process.
|
http://www.newyorkfed.org/aboutthefe...int/fed49.html
Actual printed money is a small percentage of our actual "money supply". They print money because we need it. Old money needs to be replaced and we have to fund liquidity.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."
|