Unless you can show me a PhD in math or in physics, I'm not inclined to believe that you have even a fraction of the background and knowledge required to understand string theory enough to make the claim that "it makes the Biblical seem scientific."
You're welcome to your opinion about the theory, but please, discuss that opinion. I'm neither a mathematician nor a physicist, but I look at it and it makes some sense to me. How do you come to the conclusion that string theory makes "3+3 must equal 17?" It's a theory, it has gaps. Where it doesn't have gaps, it does seem to make some sense-to me at least. Do you subscribe to an alternate theory that fills in some of those gaps? Or one that contradicts it?
It's very apparent to you that it claims 3+3=17, which we know is wrong. It's not so clear to me either that it claims that or that it's absolutely wrong.
|