View Single Post
Old 11-29-2006, 01:22 PM   #23 (permalink)
Sticky
 
Sticky's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakk
They "need" to tax us enough to pay off the debt accrued in order to build the current society.

Currently, the government has a few billion dollars of extra tax "needed" above and beyond the annual requirements.

I will try this one more time becuase I may not be explining it correctly.

Yes, they do need to pay down the debt.
The amount that they want to pay should be part of the annual budget.
They should have a planned amount that they want to pay and it should not be whatever we accidentally have left over at the end of the year.

Aside from emergencies and unforseen events they should not be sepnding on anything that is not in the budget. Remember, the budget was approved by parliament as a blueprint for what the government is going to collect and what they are going to spend.

A surplus arises from a few possibilities:
- Poor budgeting
- Poor use of allocated funds (not using what was allotted)
- cutting costs
- unforseen revenues

A defecit arises from a few possibilities
- Poor budgeting
- mismanagement of allocated funds
- unforseen costs
- lower than expected revenues

Most of the reasons for being off budget, by large amounts not by small amounts, are due to mismanagement whether there is a defecit or surplus.

The reason a surplus sounds better is becuase:
- The government will spin it as if they did something good
- The consequences are favorable to being off budget in the other direction (defecit)


We should not be happy with a goverment that consistently has a surplus.
It means they did not budget correctly and that money that they collected should have been alloted to something in the budget (e.g. like paying down the debt).

Quote:
Originally Posted by grolsch
Being in Montreal, I have no choice but to vote liberal.
I did not vote liberal last election. I could not do it anymore. I would have lived with the consequences.

Quote:
Originally Posted by feelgood
Wow, that statement is just...odd.

How can you have no choice?

I think the idea is that if the non-Bloc voters split their votes between other candidates then the Bloc will win.
I don't think this is a crucial as in the provincial elections. I can live with the Bloc but I don't want to live with the PQ. The PQ are going to try for another referendum.
__________________
Sticky The Stickman

Last edited by Sticky; 11-29-2006 at 01:25 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Sticky is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360