As with all sound bytes this is a loaded issue. There are two real questions we have to ask. What does 'support' mean? And what is meant by 'our troops'? I think any debate really breaks down into a symantical argument over what these terms mean.
So, as for me, if support means unquestioning affirmation then I say no. If it means wish them well then I say yes. As for our troops, if that means the individual people serving in general then yes. However, if it means the overall structure and institution of 'our troops' then no. Also if it means all troops without exception then no, since I will not stand behind those troops that unjustly take life, rape, or abuse. To sum up then, I don't want any of the individuals sent overseas for war to come to harm and I will actively do what I can to protect them and help them do their jobs, however I will not turn a blind eye to the activities of some troops that I feel act contrary to the general principle I just stated or basic human decency. I further, will not support a policy, institution, or administration that I feel act contrary either. I support the troops in my prayers for their well being, in my votes to elect officials I think can best handle the situation they are in, and by exercising the rights I feel they are risking their lives for.
I think a more accurate question is 'What does supporting our troops mean to you?'. I think that would more accurately present a balanced sentiment towards our feelings on this issue, but maybe that is just me.
__________________
"The courts that first rode the warhorse of virtual representation into battle on the res judicata front invested their steed with near-magical properties." ~27 F.3d 751
|