Obviously a baited question that wouldve been called out if it were posted by a conserative
FYI...I wasnt "afraid" of Saddam. Hell, nobody was; it was the weaponry and info he couldve passed on to terrorists that concerned people.
Also, FWIW.....
I actually participated during the first first gulf war and let me endulge you liberal pontificators on what actually occured there.My unit was charged with the supervision and sweeping of blown out bunkers in Kuwait and Iraq. The bunker usually had 3-4 Iraqi soldiers who manned the AA artillery guns and the bunkers.
While watching outsourced Saudis clean out the blood, guts, and other pleasantries from the blown out bunkers, they found manuals descrbing their orders which included the obligation to shoot any wannabee deserter, regardless of reason. More often than not, people tried to flee the bunkers not out of fear, or American airpower, bvut rather because they were thirsty and hungry. You see, Saddam deprived his own soldiers the basics to survive and more times than not, we would see bodies lying about 75-100 feet from the bunkers, shot in the back. Saddam was an evil fuckhead and for people to come on here in the comfort of their own warm and cozy homes and pntificate what we should do or that Saddam is flat out ignorant, arrogant, and out of touch
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christine Stewart, Former Minister of the Environment of Canada
"No matter if the science is all phony, there are collateral environmental benefits.... Climate change [provides] the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world."
|
|