Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
Are you asking my opinion or the general rule? I'd ask: why? There are a ton of fish in the sea, and only a few are your cousins.
|
I don't think any of us is in a position to make a general rule.
My point is that being biologically related as cousin does not have any strong correlation to being related in a social sense,
Biologically unrelated siblings (adoptions, step-siblings) that are raised together, in my opinion, shouldn't have any sexual interaction. That kicks my "ick" factor on.
However, partially biologically related people who have had little interaction with each other throughout their lives doesn't offend me.
Further, and somewhat contradictory, "long lost" direct relatives also shouldn't have sexual activity together. For obvious icky arbitrary reasons.