Quote:
Originally Posted by gregor
I agree that God can never be fully understood, but if science is a tool by which we may reach more knowledge about God, why must God and science necessarily be separated? If He/She created everything, then He/She also created the entropy law, which seems to be a very important tool in evolution.
|
*If* we reach knowledge about God through science eventually, then the discussion will change, but why frame a discussion about something that hasn't happened yet and there's no evidence that will happen?
You're still framing questions in the 'if God exists' hypothetical. I say, Why bother with that hypothetical if there is absolutely no proof of God's existence? It's like posing a hypothetical questions around faries or Zeus. It's an exercise in futility.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SirLance
Sure I can. I just can't offer any proof.
|
Isn't that called fiction?