So what you're saying, ustwo, is that Al Gore is basically potentially full of crap, is that it? Hey, we Tennesseans have known that for years - that's why we didn't put him over the top in 2000!
I am like most Americans and don't have a true in-depth knowledge of the science of climate activity, but I do know enough to realize that when dueling apologists appear, one doesn't pick one's side before fully checking out the information presented by both. Pity the rest of America is so indoctrinated to believe the doom's day theory of "global warming" over Sen. Imhoffe's. Especially when his arguement has been so well presented. (Yes, I read it all)
Edited to state: Just because an argument comes from someone who is in a political party that one doesn't espouse doesn't mean that this view point isn't valid, Host and Roachboy. Pardon me for saying, but it appears that the two of you seem to discount any argument that doesn't fit in with your view of how you see the world. You just want to put down what doesn't fit with your views. That's your right - just as it's my right to give my view.
