View Single Post
Old 11-17-2006, 11:25 AM   #21 (permalink)
roachboy
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
on the international reaction: i am surprised at the extent to which the reactions i have been following are rooted in close sustained attention not just to the elections themselves, but also to the figuring of the new line-ups, etc.: within this, what is interesting is the extent to which french and english language press coverage of american politics is infinitely more nuanced/detailed than any american coverage of any other country's political landscape.
yet another argument in favor of turning off your television.

and here is another: the apparent persuasive power of the "manly man" approach to iraq--sqaure of jaw and bereft of information--is a direct function of television's figuration of information. from any other viewpoint, the refusal to interact with either information or complexity would be seen as pathological--but in a visual culture wholly dominated by decontextualized imagery, the square=jawed man who repeats and repeats the same things can come to be seen as "resolute" or "manly"---and this has everything to do with the ways in which political information is mediated in the states, and almost nothing with that of the relation between the content of what is said and the putative referent (in this case iraq)....the flip of this is obvious: that politicos who try to address complexity--and who by extension find themselves bumped out of being able to rely on the square-jawed repetition of simple memes--appear "weak" or unmanly.

it is crazy, the power of tele-mediation in the states: a top-down corporate autocracy gets to frame in a close-to-absolute way how american pseudo-democracy functions. worse, a top-down corporate autocracy has, via repetition, managed to frame in its own image the boundary between inside and outside: what complicates the relationship between face-shot, utterances and the notion of acceptable duration for political propositions particular to commercial news outlets gets processed not as a limitation of the medium, but as a limitation imputed to those who interact with the medium, whose political signifiers are shaped through it.
which means that people have naturalized television, collapsed its medium-specific limitations onto the "reality" that is framed by/through them.

which is stupid: nothing more or less.

turn off the fucking television and read.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360