Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sasKuach
We're reading your posts, Will, but I just can't think of a better way to put it than: condiments are not as scary as guns. That's why we need to use guns on criminals. I want to scare the bloody piss out of them. I want criminals scared to leave their holes. Mace will not do that.
In fact, 3 cans of mace in those girls' purses wouldn't have done jack shit.
|
except made the unaffected part of the mob even angrier
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
A gernade would probably be even scarier than a gun, why not carry gernades?
A shoulder mounted missile is a lot scarrier than a little gun, why not carry them? If you realyl want to scare the piss out of someone, aim a bazooka at them.
|
ludicrous arguments that have no relevance.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
In OPINION, 3 cans of mace in those girls' purses wouldn't have done jack shit. In my opinion, it very easily been enough to deter them. Also, whos' to say that a gun would have saved these girls? I think that's making a very big assumption. What if one of the girls would have pulled a gun and shot and missed? What if one of the assailents grabbed the gun? Now we have armed assailents. It could have been even worse with guns.
|
I once asked one of my hometown police officers if having a gun against a group of thugs did any good, how would it work. He told me all you had to do was point it at one of them and empty the magazine in to him, the rest would scatter like a flock of pheasants. Sounds like good advice to me.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
Last edited by dksuddeth; 11-15-2006 at 03:48 PM..
Reason: Automerged Doublepost
|