View Single Post
Old 05-28-2003, 08:06 PM   #1 (permalink)
Miekle
Insane
 
Location: your front door...*ding dong*
Bugs weeds and houseplants could join war on terror.

I read this in the USA TODAY was a rather interesting article. Not sure why they added some of the stuff in they did but it's still cool to know the stuff technology can do today.

by Mimi Hall
"Cutting-edge science may protect homeland"


When June Medford came up with the idea to use tiny weeds as weapons in the war against terrorism, she figured most people would call it a joke. But the federal government didn't laugh.

Now, armed with half million-dollar grant from the Pentagon, the Colorado State University plant biologist is trying to genetically engineer Arabidopsis plants to change color rapidly if they sense a biological or chemical agent.

If her plan works, the technology could be used to turn forest evergreens, backyard shrubs or even pond algae into sentinels for scientists. One day, everyone in America might be able to use cheap houseplant as an early-warning system. It could be the proverbial canary in a coal mine for the post-Sept.. 11 age.

"A lot of us started thinking differently after 9/11," Medford says. When she ran the idea by government officials, "they said, 'Well, lets give it a try, because if it does work, it could make a huge difference.' "

Medford's Fort Collins, Colo., laboratory is among scores across the country where scientists and entreptreneures are working on products that could help the government prevent or respond to another terrorist attack.

In Richmond, Va., a biologist is trapping insects such as beetles, crickets, bees and moths to see whether they could be used as environmental monitors of biological and chemical agents. In Menlo Park. Calif., researchers are trying to develop a handheld coice-recognition translator that could help federal border agents communicate with foreigners seeking to enter the United States. Outside Chicago, workers at a small research company are seeking to devise an inexpensive DNA detector that could be used by people with no background in molecular biology to diagnose, quickly and accurately, an infectious disease such as smallpox.

These efforts sound like they belong in a sciencefiction movie. But they're all real-life, cutting-edge projects, funded partially by government grants.

Officials acknowledge that some of the projects won't pan out. But they say government invest,emt in high-tech research is worthwhile. Some of the projects could be useful additions to the war on terrorism; others could recolutionize the way officials protect the nation from attack.

Anti-terror weeds and bugs

Under the terms of Medford's grant, she has 18 months to figure out how to make her weeds tattle on terrorists. If one of her plants noticed a deadly nerve agent such as sarin gas, it would probably be too late to help people nearby. But if it sensed anthrax in the air, people could know they were exposed before showing symptoms. That would give them more time to take antibiotics.

Medford's not using real biological and chemical agents in her experiments, which are aimed at causing the rapid breakdown of chlorophyll. She's using estrogen, because experiments have found it will prompt the "de-greening circuit" in plants. That has prompted jokes from friends who tell her, "Estrogen could be a terrorist agent."

>>At virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond, biologist Karen Kester has worked for two years to see whether insects can deliver information about hazardous or deadly agents in the soil, on the ground or in the air. Funded by a $1 million Pentagon grant, she uses black lights, sticky papers and traps to collect more than two dozen species of bugs.
The bugs are "like little sponges or dust mops," Kester says. If officials suspected a toxin had been released in a building or park, they could mobilize teams of emergency workers in protective suits to swab for samples. Or the could let the bugs crawl and fly around, picking up samples, and then collect them for tests. For routine monitoring, she says, bugs could be used as part of a "24/7 sampling scheme."


Sorry if there are any typos's I just typed it up from what I was reading couldn't find the online article.
Miekle is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360