|
As I have been in a subject discussion similar to this one, here is my theory that I have been pretty much able to show substantial evidence.
The answer would typically be "C" and this is why.....
"SEX" in a nutshell is the physical union of two bodies (can be hetero or homosexual) There is no "love" required for this act to be made, however some people do CHOSE to not allow themselves to have "sex" if there is no love involved. Personally I think what we need to do, is look at the terminology used:
Therefore "SEX" would be not having the requirement of having love, but if there would be an emotional attachment, then it wouldn't be "sex" it would be considered "making love" in the adult form of the use of these words.
Basically if you were to have sex with a total stranger, most people would say "I had casual 'SEX' with the person I met at the bar", and in the other term, most people would say "I 'MADE LOVE' to my wife/husband/SO last night."
Now that doesn't mean that two people in love can't have "SEX". Imagine a quickie that two people would have say in the afternoon before the kids got home, THAT could be considered having "SEX" with your SO.
Now As I say, this is my OPINION, but I think that by the way it is broken down, it could be pretty close to commonality.
__________________
"It is not that I have failed, but that I have found 10,000 ways that it DOESN'T work!" --Thomas Edison
|