Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Paq
so i was thinking
and this probably belongs more in tilted paranoia, but anyway
what if the republicans rigged it so they would lose this time....so the dems and the rest of the country would believe the diebold/electronic voting machines were accurate....
think about it, not much is going to happen for 2 yrs now, but they set the stage for a very close 2008 battle that a .......buggy...voting machine could sway. then the dems and others complain about diebold and the republicans point to the 2006 elections and say how they didn't complain. I mean, webb capitulated very quickly as did bush in dropping rummy....
just tossin it out there
|
I shouldn't read stuff like this when I'm stoned because it makes me consider the scenario as a plausable explanation. But it seems to me to be a lot to try and keep together over a long period of time. And just not really feasable as a good strategy. It's sounds casually simple enough, but the logistics would be boggling I think.
I just wanted to say that I gave your idea some thought when I read it 
__________________
"The theory of a free press is that truth will emerge from free discussion, not that it will be presented perfectly and instantly in any one account." -- Walter Lippmann
"You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists." -- Abbie Hoffman
|