Quote:
|
Originally Posted by shakran
Before I start responding to your comments, I feel I have to note that you're becoming insulting and hostile again. Didn't getting a temporary ban the first time teach you any lessons about this board's anti-jerk policy?
A vague insult that means nothing. You seem to be good at this since you resort to it every time you can't coax your mind into coming up with a logical comeback.
|
on one point, you are correct. I apologize to you for the insult and hostility. I'll rein it in.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by shakran
Such as the right not to be shot by some Rambo-wannabe who thinks he's saving the day?
|
no such law exists, otherwise we'd be seeing police prosecuted all the time. Now, you have the right not to be shot, stabbed, clubbed, and beat to death, but we call that murder so basically you have the right not to be murdered. Does that law stop it? no, it does not. It only allows for the punishment of the guilty. Gun laws do not stop the criminal from getting a gun, but they also make it extremely difficult, if not impossible, for a non-criminal to get a gun also. There is something unconstitutional about that.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by shakran
This sentence was barely english, but I think you're saying you are opposed to regulating items that are used in committing crimes. I find it difficult to believe that you would want to encourage criminals by deregulating items which are meant for one purpose and one purpose only - - -killing things.
|
because the gun can be used by a criminal or by someone defending themselves, therefore it shouldn't be regulated. Only the actions of the person wielding it should be regulated.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by shakran
That's your logic, not mine.
|
it's not my logic, it's the current state of all gun laws, which are not logical by any means.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by shakran
More insults. Let's be totally open and honest with each other here. As long as you continue to act like a colossal jackass regarding this issue, you're not going to drum up support for it from anyone who didn't already support it. I don't know how the hell you manage to convince anyone of anything by talking to people like that, but it's not going to work here.
|
Question, why are you slamming me for generalizing people as stupid but haven't even bothered to correct willravel for the same thing, especially since he used the term first? lets be consistent at least, k?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
Why stop at your house? In Florida, the chad state, you can blow away some piehole into the next millenia wherever you want.
If two people are robbing a 7-11 in Florida, can they legally blow each other away?
|
no, because they initiated the aggressive action, however, the store owner (or any other citizen thats armed) can blow both of them away.
longbough has it right, we've beat this deadhorse many times over.