View Single Post
Old 11-03-2006, 03:32 PM   #101 (permalink)
KnifeMissile
 
KnifeMissile's Avatar
 
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leto
You're close, in the sense that I operate out of a set of definitions. It is senseless to discourse on a topic, without defining your terms and/or parameters, as you would need to be able to communicate your ideas.
Indeed... However, if your contention is that we have done so here, I would disagree. We had a basic understanding of the terms and it was good enough to facilitate communication. Now that we are scritinizing our ideas through our words, we must now be more specific in our words' meanings...

Quote:
I would dispute that you have faith that your glass of coke will fall, I would instead state that you know from experience, empirically derived, plus from the knowledge of proven scientific theorems, that in the presence of the force of gravity, and, all other things being unchanged or equal (ceteris paribus) your glass coke will continue this behaviour each time you let go of it.
Okay, this clears things up quite a bit. You'll note that this differs from other people's use of that word in this thread but that's okay. As long as I know who is using what word in what way, I can keep track of things...

By the way, by definition, science doesn't have theorems, as such. They're pretty much the realm of mathematics only and for good philosophical reasons that I can explain but would probably be better placed in Tilted Knowledge...

Quote:
Your faith in the scientific method is your starting point. And useful for the paradigm of your world.

Faith in a god, does not require scientific theorems or proofs. It stands on it's own merit as being merely accepted.

the same faith operates for atheism, as there is no proof (or just as much proof as for theists) to support that there is no god. It merely takes faith to believe that there is no god.
Well, it is true that there are no scientific experiments to show that there is no God. The reason for that is because God is not a scientific theory. There are no scientific experiments to show that there is no Flying Spaghetti Monster but I'd be surprised if you think that such a belief is reasonable or that such non-belief would constitute "faith."

Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
knife missle:

whaddya getting so pissy about? i just asked a question.
Really? Here's what you said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
hmm...philosophy is "bullshit" but religion is serious.

ok, i dont get it.
Where's your question?

I got a little pissy (but only a little) because you feigned thnking (with your "hmm" remark) and then utterly mangled the meaning of a sentence. This annoyed me...

Quote:
here is why:

i understood the context (none of this is rocket science, you know?)
but i found it a strange statement.

and the syllogism you run out it like most are--formally ok but not really terribly illuminating.
that's the problem with syllogisms.
i could go on to make a parallel between this choice of demonstration, the peculiar syntax of your snippy response to me, but like they used to say on "in living color" homey dont play that.
Really? You didn't find my explanation of how you completely misconstrued my sentence "illuminating?" Does that mean you're going to misconstrue my other and future sentences the same way?

What was strange about my statement? You could have talked about that instead of... Well, you totally misinterpreted my sentence so I guess it didn't matter what you said after that...

Quote:
see?
pissy is easy peasy.
generally, though, it doesnt really get you anywhere.
i indulge it from time to time, it never seems to get me anywhere, so i relay that bit of accumulated "wisdom" to you.
...but did you have a reason to be pissy? At least I understood what you said! I don't indulge pissy often but, like you, I practice it from time to time and your post was very hard to resist...

Quote:
i could go on, but this is not the kind of exchange i had in mind at all, and really is not that much fun.

have a lovely thread.
I can understand staying out of threads that you don't enjoy. You don't see me much in Tilted Politics anymore, do you? If you check far enough, you'll see that I used to be quite active there but then I realized that I wasn't enjoying it so...

Last edited by KnifeMissile; 11-03-2006 at 03:51 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
KnifeMissile is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360