Originally Posted by willravel

There is no assumption in the data.

I am curious, though, as to why someone would vote for a bumbling idiot. I know that I am significantly smarter than George W. Bush will ever be (as a paleologist is smarter than a brontosaurus), but I'd never run for President because I don't think I am capable enough to do the best job in that position. There are amazing demands made on the President every day, and when a monkey is left to make those decisions it's no wonder that problems arise. I realize that Gore was boring, not that bright, and riding the Clinton coat tails, and Kerry was pretty weak, and not a strong candiadte, but were they so bad that you would vote for the halfwit?