Quote:
If the post that followed my "Benjamin Ferencz" post, was intended to counter my arguments, and continue the discussion, why didn't it's author do that? Instead, he made his post about me....he criticized "how" I posted, and not my arguments or citations. He challenged me to "prove to [him] that the Iraqi invasion was illegal."
Since he didn't challenge anything that I posted, and did not question the credibility of expert Benjamin Ferencz, or his opinion, or mine...for that matter, what do you think that the purpose of his post was? Does he want more information (he challenged me to "prove"....)....wouldn't that require posting even more, in the way that he objected to?
|
I worked 36 hours this weekend in 3 days. Sorry I could not answer your post to your acceptance.
__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas
|