Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
Let's put it this way: Any trait which would prevent a species from reproducing is lost over time and, as we all know, homosexuals rarely ever have children. Anything which would inhibit any given organism from reproducing is considered unwanted/a defect. Thefore, the notion that homosexuality is genetic in humans is-- For lack of a better word-- Preposterous.
If you don't agree, then take it up with basic Darwinism.
|
Some of the writings from Ancient Greece explain how homosexuality was a normal part of a man's life. That suggests that homosexuality isn't something new, so you're probably wrong. As a matter of fact, as animals become more social as they evolve, it is observed that homosexuality becomes more prevenalt. It has been documented consistantly from anything from penguins (March of the Penguins 2: Queen of the Nile), bison, sheep, dogs, cats, dolphins, and pigs, so you're completly wrong. Preposterous, indeed.
Jerks would have been removed from the gene pool hundreds of thousands of years ago if your simplistic description of darwinism was true.