10-26-2006, 08:39 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Junkie
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Yakk
YW pan.
Care to provide an actual substantial attack, or is a vague one your goal?
Are you talking about air transport, blue water navies, nuclear bombs, economic entanglement, logistics - or what? Your complaint is more than a bit hand wavy and vague.
|
Sorry. I forgot:
Quote:
U.S. to provide Canadian air cover
Afghanistan 'too far' for our fighter jets 
Canadian soldiers deploying next month to Afghanistan will be relying on the United States for air cover after a proposal to send Canadian fighter-bombers to the region was scrapped at the last minute, the Post has learned.....
http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/s...073b6b&k=67952
|
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Christine Stewart, Former Minister of the Environment of Canada
"No matter if the science is all phony, there are collateral environmental benefits.... Climate change [provides] the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world."
|
|
|
|