Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dilbert1234567
Thermite burns very hot, even if you had a holder that would press the thermite against the beam, as soon as the thermite melted the initial side of the beam, the flow of the thermite would be down, and not through the rest of the beam. It would be much more practical to use a shaped charge to sever the beam, as I have said before thermite is ridiculous.
|
The idea of the thermite came about after reports kept coming from ground zero of molten steel. Thermite could explain that level of heat.
I still am only reading speculation. I'd like to get proof that thermite can't do what it appeared to do on 9/11.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dilbert1234567
Well, my physics professor has a Ph. D. in Physics from University of California-Davis, 1997, and a B. A. in Physics (Math/Fine Arts minors) Washington University, 1990. My second physic professor has a doctorate in Physics, and I’m not sure what else. And my physics lab instructor has a doctorate in physics and Chemistry, worked on the Manhattan project, and the project to make the h-bomb (I don’t recall its name), a member of the American Nuclear Society as well as several other high profile physics projects, that’s just the ones I know about, I have an email asking him for the full list of his credentials, he knows more than 99% of all physics professors, all agree that it the official story is along the lines of what really happened. If the building fell faster then freefall speeds, you’ve got something, until that changes; near freefall speeds are obtainable.
|
Faster than freefall speeds? Through magic, maybe. Relatively cool fires and crash damage towards the top of the building aren't going to bring down two of the best built buildings in history in under an hour and slightly over an hour. That aside for a moment, here's the biggest problem: you can't back this up without divolgung who you really are, and I'm not going to ask you to do that. I can say that I spoke to Porfessor Hawkings about the problem, and he blames alines, but it's meaningless without producing the person. The only real way to do this is to invite Professor Oppenheimer on to TFP so I can take him on head on. If I, a lowly psych major, can actually hold my own against someone of that calibur, it might be time to admit something fishy is going on.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dilbert1234567
But seriously, I see no point to continue this further, it’s pointless, I show you undeniable evidence that the walls slowly were pulled in a few minutes prior to the collapse, which rules out explosives and thermite is still insisted as being used.
|
In which post did you show me undeniable evidence that airline fuel fires can bring down the WTC South tower in under an hour? I must have missed it. As I've stated several times, I have no idea about the thermite, but I do know how quickly that building fell and that it makes no sense.